CGIAR System-wide Genetic Resources Programme

 

Home
News

About SGRP

Our work

Governance

Resourcing SGRP

The in-trust collections

Treaty

MTAs

SINGER

Current SGRP initiatives

Global Public Goods Project

Platform for Agrobiodiversity Research

Valuation of genetic resources

Options and strategies for livestock

Representation at International Policy Fora

 

Options and strategies for livestock

Home - Publications - Contacts - Links
 

International workshop on options and strategies for conserving the world’s farm animal genetic resources

The scope of SGRP’s programme covers crop, forestry, aquatic and livestock genetic resources, reflecting the importance of understanding and integrating all components of agrobiodiversity.

Farm animals play a crucial part in the livelihood systems of communities all over the world. They provide food and clothing, and are important for income generation, to store wealth, to provide traction and for nutrient recycling. They make a particularly important contribution to the well-being of the most vulnerable groups – small-holders in marginal environments, especially women and children.

The sustainability of this contribution depends on the availability and optimal use of farm animal diversity into the future. Yet rapid changes in agriculture globally may place farm animal genetic resources at risk.

In response to this concern, SGRP convened a workshop in November 2005, in association with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), AGROPOLIS and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ). The workshop, hosted by AGROPOLIS in Montpellier, France, reviewed and analyzed options and strategies for conserving farm animal genetic resources against the background of recent advances in knowledge and technology, and with a focus on the needs of developing countries.

Find out more:

 

The threat of genetic erosion

The diversity of cattle, sheep, goat, pig, poultry and breeds of other farm animal species represents an irreplaceable source of traits for livestock development to respond to changing environmental conditions and human needs. However, these genetic resources are being eroded as a result of changing agricultural practices and economic, environmental and other factors. Of particular concern are the high rates of loss of indigenous breeds in developing countries, which, coupled with inadequate attention to the use and management of the genetic resources, are seriously reducing the livelihood options of the poor.

Back to top

 

An international response

The need to arrest the erosion of farm animal genetic resources (FAnGR) and establish programmes for their conservation and sustainable use is well recognized. It is embodied in the objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity and in FAO’s Global Strategy for the Management of Farm Animal Genetic Resources. Noting the need for a greater understanding of the status of farm animal genetic resources and the measures necessary for their conservation and sustainable use worldwide, in 1999 the FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture initiated a country-driven process to develop the first ‘Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources’. The Report will be reviewed in draft form by FAO’s Intergovernmental Technical Working Group on Animal Genetic Resources when it meets in Rome in December 2006, and finalized at the First International Technical Conference on Animal Genetic Resources in September 2007, hosted by the Government of Switzerland.

Back to top

 

The workshop

The SGRP workshop brought together 63 scientists, conservation programme managers and other FAnGR experts from 28 countries, and from the CGIAR Centres (ICARDA, ILRI, Bioversity International), the French scientific community (including CIRAD - Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement, and INRA - Institut national de la recherche agronomique, France), FAO and GTZ. Participants aimed at assisting the international community to develop a global framework for FAnGR conservation and identify priorities for action. To this end, the workshop focused on the following questions:

  • Why is the conservation of FAnGR needed?

  • What is the nature and status of threats to FAnGR?

  • What types of conservation will be required?

  • What are the key knowledge and information gaps?

  • What are the priorities for action?

Some of the most commonly agreed reasons for conserving FAnGR include the prevention of the erosion of the genetic diversity needed to provide options for adapting to changing environmental conditions and production systems, and to support livestock improvement and sustainable production. Other motives include the need to provide options to meet the demands of new markets for livestock products, and to preserve and pass on the cultural and historical value of livestock and its diversity to future generations. 

Back to top

 

The workshop findings

Decision-making framework
The workshop defined a framework to guide decision-making on the optimal conservation strategy for a given farm animal genetic resource. The framework helps identify a strategy based on the severity and speed of the threats to which the genetic resource is exposed, the ways in which the resource is valued, and the capacity to take action to conserve it. A coherent strategy will include an appropriate combination of in situ, ex situ in vivo and in vitro conservation methods. In determining the precise combination of conservation methods to use, the following factors should be considered:

  • In situ (community-based, management and conservation) approaches should be the preferred method of conservation where maintenance of the FAnGR is the best available livelihood option for the livestock keepers involved.

  • Ex situ in vivo conservation in institutional or communally owned herds or flocks can be used successfully to support conservation of FAnGR that have current value.

  • In vitro conservation is needed to provide a secure back-up for the developing world’s FAnGR in the face of natural and human disasters that could drive the FAnGR to extinction faster than in situ or in vivo approaches can respond.

Priorities for Action
The workshop identified priorities for action addressing general considerations, conservation, and research and information.

General priorities

Action 1: Develop policy that promotes use of appropriate FAnGR and supports the conservation of FAnGR. 

Action 2: Show the benefits and costs of conservation and raise awareness of the issues. 

Action 3: Establish international funding mechanisms, legal frameworks and advocacy to support the actions of developing countries to conserve FAnGR.

Action 4: Develop policy and guidelines for biosecurity, exchange, ownership, access and benefit-sharing of FAnGR.

Conservation priorities

Action 5: Develop capacity for cryopreservation, including the development of human and technical resources.

Action 6: Determine the most appropriate system for regional and international cryopreservation programmes as a back-up for in situ and ex situ in vivo methods.

Action 7: Identify hotspots of diversity and identify the most threatened FAnGR within those hotspots and take action to conserve them now.

Action 8: Establish early warning and response systems for emergency threats to FAnGR.

Research and information priorities

Action 9: Capture all existing information on FAnGR in an internationally accessible information system and couple this with tools for analysis and interpretation of information and for decision-making.

Action 10: Improve the level of knowledge about how to prioritize, design and operate conservation and use programmes that will be sustainable in the medium to long term.

Action 11: Complete global surveys of the molecular genetic diversity of the major livestock species.

Action 12: Undertake critical analyses of the economies of scale for various conservation actions and interventions.

Action 13: Improve the technologies and reduce costs of cryopreservation of gametes, embryos and somatic cells of most species of FAnGR. 

Knowledge gaps

The workshop recognized that the priorities for action can only be pursued if knowledge gaps be resolved. Good information is key to all decisions, but the current levels of information limit the quality of decision-making and the ability to advise governments and other agencies on how to develop policies to promote conservation and sustainable use of FAnGR. Four specific knowledge gaps were identified by the workshop:

  • Lack of high quality information about the status, characteristics, and current and future values of most FAnGR, due to poorly developed knowledge and information systems and low levels of information gathering.

  • A lack of inventory, analysis and design of policy and regulatory frameworks and how they affect conservation efforts.

  • Lack of knowledge about how to prioritise, design and operate conservation and utilisation programmes that will be sustainable in the medium to long term.

  • Limited understanding of methods suitable for valuing FAnGR and limited information on the costs and the benefits of different conservation methods are hampering the development of conservation on the scale required.

See the workshop report (1.1MB)

See the papers presented at the workshop (890KB)

Back to top

 

Next steps

The findings of the workshop described above were presented at a side event organized by FAO in association with SGRP during the Eighth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP8), in Curitiba, Brazil, 20-31 March 2006. The outputs of the workshop have also contributed to the advancement of the Global Strategy for the Management of Farm Animal Genetic Resources including preparation of the first ‘Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources’. SGRP will participate in the fora at which the Report will be discussed including the meeting of the Intergovernmental Technical Working Group on Animal Genetic Resources in December 2006, and the First International Technical Conference on Animal Genetic Resources in September 2007.

The CGIAR System
Africa Rice Center (WARDA)
Bioversity International
CIAT
CIFOR
CIMMYT
CIP
ICARDA
ICRISAT
IFPRI
IITA
ILRI
IRRI
IWMI
World Agroforestry Centre
 WorldFish Center
 

 


 

Back to top


© 2006 Bioversity International. Unless protected by other copyrights.  This website is a collective work
which includes contributions from the SGRP and the CGIAR Centres. Bioversity International administers
this website on behalf of the SGRP.